Date published: 2008/02/23
The BBC says:
Calls to put the DNA of every UK resident on a national database are impractical, the government has said.
A senior police officer has argued for a universal register, after two killers were convicted on DNA evidence.
Sally Anne Bowman's killer, Mark Dixie, and Suffolk serial murderer Steve Wright were both captured because their DNA was taken after unrelated offences.
But the Home Office said a mandatory database "would raise significant practical and ethical issues".
The DNA database, which covers England and Wales, currently contains around 4.5m profiles - routinely taken from criminal suspects after most arrests.
It is already the largest of its kind in the world but is controversial.
Since 2004, the data of everyone arrested for a recordable offence - all but the most minor offences - has remained on the system regardless of their age, the seriousness of their alleged offence, and whether or not they were prosecuted.
The police always want more powers to make their job easier, what a surprise. If solving crime were the only criterion under consideration then the government might as well force all its citizens to be permanently tracked with GPS devices (well, mobile phones are not too far off that already). In fact, why stop there. Make everyone wear permanent audio and omni-directional video recording devices whose output is automatically sent wirelessly to some police computer. That way we might even be able to "solve" some pre-crimes, never mind actual crimes. Welcome to Britain in the 21st century. (Fortunately, getting everyone onto the DNA database would be a rather expensive exercise, otherwise no doubt the government would have already done it.)
_________________________________________________________
All material not included from other sources is copyright cambridge2000.com.
For further information or questions email: info [at] cambridge2000 [dot] com
(replace "[at]" with "@" and "[dot]" with ".").